Extract data-use controls without outsourcing judgment to AI

What Audarel extracts

The extraction boundary is deliberately narrow. Audarel looks for purpose, recipient, environment, transfer method, permitted and required fields, population limits, authorized users, retention, expiry, publication, redisclosure, DUO terms, and institutional authorization requirements.

Each candidate includes a source citation, clause text, normalized operator and value, and confidence. The original encrypted document and SHA-256 hash remain attached to the record.

What the model does not decide

The model does not decide whether the agreement is enforceable, whether an exception is legally permissible, whether the organization has a lawful basis, or whether a release should be approved. It cannot silently convert a low-confidence extraction into policy.

• No autonomous legal interpretation
• No release decision from model confidence
• No approval or exception authority
• No replacement for counsel or the data owner
• No unreviewed amendment merge

Reviewer confirmation workflow

Stewards can confirm, reject, or edit each candidate. Edits preserve the actor and create a new agreement version. The confirmed control remains linked to the source citation so another reviewer can challenge or reproduce the interpretation.

Why extraction alone is not compliance

Generic contract extraction tools are valuable for search and obligation reporting. Release governance requires a second step: apply the confirmed term to a specific recipient, purpose, payload, environment, date, and user list; then collect accountable approval and preserve evidence. Audarel connects those steps.

Confirm requirements against current source material.

Requirements and vendor capabilities change. Confirm the current source and your approved QC plan before changing a production process.

• NIST AI Risk Management Framework
• NIST Privacy Framework